[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.19667028 [View]
File: 93 KB, 850x400, quote-what-then-shall-a-catholic-christian-do-if-some-novel-contagion-attempt-to-infect-no-vincent-of-lerins-84-7-0716.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19667028

>>19665769
Because we follow the original teachings of the holy apostles, not theological innovations which can change drastically in a couple of centuries from proclaiming something heresy for ages, then making saints out of supposed heretics.

>> No.19523093 [View]
File: 93 KB, 850x400, quote-what-then-shall-a-catholic-christian-do-if-some-novel-contagion-attempt-to-infect-no-vincent-of-lerins-84-7-0716.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19523093

>>19523039
You haven't presented an actual argument, just quoted names of some people I haven't even mentioned.
>Kallistos Ware says
He is not an authority over St. Cyril. Sacred heart divides the single adoration to Christ's person, which is anathema and separates you from salvation.

>>19523048
I was never a part of Calvinism or any other sect. It's very telling that those who support heart-worship never have an argument for their innovative belief (which is nowhere to be seen in antiquity).
Also all heresy is supposed to be hated by the Christian since it is a sin, and sacred heart is just spawned from a group of heretics. There is no charity towards sin or false teaching, only towards people.

>> No.19287075 [View]
File: 93 KB, 850x400, quote-what-then-shall-a-catholic-christian-do-if-some-novel-contagion-attempt-to-infect-no-vincent-of-lerins-84-7-0716.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19287075

>>19286987
>One's opinion on non-dogmatically proclaimed matters
Is there a list of such matters? No, there isn't. But anything universally believed by the Church about Holy Scripture is dogma. See the criterion of St. Vincent of Lerins.
>Moreover, in the Catholic Church itself, all possible care must be taken, that we hold that faith which has been believed everywhere, always, by all. For that is truly and in the strictest sense Catholic, which, as the name itself and the reason of the thing declare, comprehends all universally. This rule we shall observe if we follow universality, antiquity, consent. We shall follow universality if we confess that one faith to be true, which the whole Church throughout the world confesses; antiquity, if we in no wise depart from those interpretations which it is manifest were notoriously held by our holy ancestors and fathers; consent, in like manner, if in antiquity itself we adhere to the consentient definitions and determinations of all, or at the least of almost all priests and doctors.
It is not the explicit acceptance of evolutionism that puts your salvation at risk, but rather the contradiction it causes with how the Church has always interpreted the creation of Adam. If you persist in this error after seeing what the fathers teach, this is when the damage to the soul happens.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]