/lit/ - Literature

>>9644385
That anon wasn't me, btw. Just a guy who I think articulated the sources and threads really well.

The more that people understand, the more perhaps there can be a common framework for a discussion that gets beyond bleeping and blooping at each other through the void. And maybe the less we go on blindly reproducing ourselves thinking we are being original or novel when in fact we are simply doing exactly the same thing.