/lit/ - Literature

>>11455549
>We're not all perfect clones of each other, but these people share a lot more of my genetic code

SPOOOOOOOKY BULLSHIT

>>10373748
>But the objective, practical dangers of depression are demotivation and self-destructive behaviour.

Oh no, we can't have people realizing there's no point in engaging in modern wagecucking or opting out of this life of misery, what an objective problem!

>>9877746
>Why don't you care about other people for literally no reason whatsoever

Yeah alright buddy, this isn't reddit

>>9624050
Back for some more eh?
Stay still this will just hurt a lot

>>8744597
Hoh boy, looks like we have our work cut out here

>>8733529
>house
>loved ones

>>8725923
Hoh boy, this is the spookiest post I seen all day
Hold still this will only hurt a lot

>>8678892
The Spookman desu

op skip all the shit itt and get stirner'd

>>8088424
>its not morally reprehensible
>you just feel its morally reprehensible
>I feel you are wrong
>lol muh feels

I've never seen someone troll this badly before

It's a spook

This is a "good" thread

lmao what a spooky thread

>>7873430

I believe that's bs

What books are essential spookwave?

What books are essential spookwave?

>>7541595

>>7502729
>>7502721
>>7502669

>degenerate

>>6368987
It's the brain and all that goes on in it.
If it is a "spook" than shouldn't you be able to mold it anyway you like like the other spooks?

>>6369028
Le Stiner face.

>Man is something only as my quality (property), like masculinity or femininity. The ancients found the ideal in one’s being male in the full sense; their virtue is virtus and arete — i.e. manliness. What is one to think of a woman who should want only to be perfectly “woman?” That is not given to all, and many a one would therein be fixing for herself an unattainable goal. Feminine, on the other hand, she is anyhow, by nature; femininity is her quality, and she does not need “true femininity.” I am a man just as the earth is a star. As ridiculous as it would be to set the earth the task of being a “thorough star,” so ridiculous it is to burden me with the call to be a “thorough man.”

>>6246929
Max Stirner was a psychological egoist (meaning he believed everyone is an egoist whether they want to be or not, and even asserted that if God exists, God must be an egoist). He was a moral nihilist, and said even might didn't make right because right and wrong don't exist. He rejected family, nation, society, law, and the property of others as "spooks", that is concepts people use to trick themselves into believing they aren't egoists. Max Stirner believe you own whatever it is you use, be it an idea, person, feeling, thing, etc. for whatever reason (love, conservation, or anything else). But that any claim of ownership beyond use was just a spook and made a god of property for crypto-egoists to kneel to.