/lit/ - Literature

he's actually really good. the work he does with that Edburg guy blows everything made by all these other internet "intellectuals" out the water.

>blocks your path to explain how the thing he started researching a couple of days ago is information you can’t live without

>>17465952
Lmao this dude

>>16679689
Have you read the critical-historical introduction to the philosophy of mythology?

Are his writings lit?

>>16007719

This blob deserves to be bullied.

It should be obvious to everyone that Kantbot is just a regular attention whore, and a pseud on top of that. Every single public action he is known for was specifically and purposefully engineered to bring eyes on him and cause controversy. Remember during the 2016 election when he stated that Trump would "complete the system of German idealism?" His intention was obviously to ruffle some feathers since he knew normie retards would interpret "German Idealism" as some neon Nazi idea, and it worked because the video spread like wildfire:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOk6HB609po

That video is the singular reason anyone even cares about him; let that sink in.

Now he and his droogs are busy riling up reactionary twitter with banal and evasive statements that you'd ordinarily expect from a midwit "apolitical" female like "Caring about stuff is for retards" "Political movements are pointless" "There is no cancel culture" and so forth. He knows he'll get attention for this, and so he does it. The longer we give him attention the more he will double down.

It should be suspicious to anyone that this guy has decided to publicly renounce his previous political views because he was bullied on Twitter. Does he even have any inner beliefs of any kind, or is he just a cynical grifter changing his views with the contemporary social currents? I'm sure if you bullied Kantbot enough you could get him to renounce intellectualism as well, if that's what it would take for him to gain more followers.

Honestly at this point I'm beginning to question anyone who ever thought that Kantbot was smart--it's really obvious that he's a 105 IQ grifter pretending to be erudite by making intentionally vague and contrarian posts on twitter and posting book covers to prove how much he "reads."

this guy is actually a retard huh?

>>13508705
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOk6HB609po
this guy, but i have no idea how is he related to the LD50 gallery

I would lie in that circumstance and the universal law would only be applicable to that one instance because every action happens in relation and to the situation that is unique.

Have you read the Historical-critical Introduction to the Philosophy of Mythology?

Is it worth exploring? Where to begin? How high does my IQ have to be to get anything out of it?