[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.3496679 [View]
File: 792 KB, 480x360, 3sBecE4.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3496679

>>3496606
>>3496629

You're mixing up what can be backed up with factual physical data and what can only be implied.

Literature, however well researched, is still only literature and in the world of fiction.
Im not arguing against stupid subjectivity in regards to whether the world is flat, or if you have cancer, however, what happens in people minds cannot be proven universally. That is the idea of subjectivity in this regard.

For instance, I am an avid follower of objectivist ideas, however, many many people object to it (lol).
How is this not a subjective topic then, if it can be interpreted many ways?

In the end, all youre doing is misinterpreting subjectivity in an effort to call people stupid.
Your parallel with the world being flat and morality shows you dont understand either. You can't morally object against factual data, because factual data is not subjective.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]