/lit/ - Literature

>>4944124
That's not what I was saying at all, class is such a stupid word to define people.

Sure, you can just put people into "poor/starving, middle and $richfag$" classes, but that's stupid as fuck.

Personal success or happiness in general doesn't stem from being dealt the right cards or rolling some good stats at birth, being born into a rich family and stuff, it stems from doing something and seeing the results of your work.
>>4944085
Okay, that's your opinion, same as anyone else can say
>butthurt poorfag detected
a la
>>4944088
but,

I've been through ups and downs so far, and I think the mind functions better the less you tax your body.
>>4944096
I don't think the answer is to just say fuck it and donate all to charity or to someone or to a bank, its all about the balance.
Don't overindulge yourself in earthly pleasures (food, drinking, drugs, sex, etc), if at all,
Don't buy both a desktop and a laptop and a tablet and a phone and an MP3/4 player and all that, just strike a balance wherever you can.
>>4944155
I don't think the rich people should have their problems fixed by anyone.
If anything, the rich are rich due to the poor, and the poor deserve to have summadat $$$ thrown their way.
It is the socially acceptable thing for them to do, or else they end up not being rich anymore (see french revolution).