/lit/ - Literature

>I must achieve internal consistency.
Is Husserl the most autistic philosopher of all time?

>>22604737
>>22604809
>>22604830
you think you're better than me you fucking faggots? you are bunch of assholes.

>"Philosophy as science, as serious, rigorous, indeed apodictically rigorous science - the dream is over."

Was Husserl right on this point?

“But what constitutes the eidetic structure of a cigarette held while looking off in the distance?”

Prepare for the most boring 40.000 pages of your life - you will need to read the entire nachlass to properly achieve your goal. You will emerge a better man in a few decades. Read 8 hours a day and play Pharaoh (1999) for one hour each night for optimal progression.

How does Husserl's later "constitutive" faculty differ from Heideggerian "disclosure"? I read some of Husserl's marginalia to the copy of Being & Time that Heidegger gave him as a gift, and he seems to think that Heidegger was just replicating the constitutive faculty of his own phenomenology without crediting him.

I've only read some of Husserl's early stuff where he is clearly a naive Fregean/Platonic realist about entities and states of affairs in the world, like scientific laws and observations of gravity, which put me off big time. But apparently he moved away from that strongly?

>>6971838
>Analytic philosophy proved him wrong a long time ago

>>6917320

what's Husserl about and why is he relevant?

>mfw reader to book is what musician is to music piece, and reading is actually skill

This is a whole new dimension of anxiety.