/lit/ - Literature

>>21323741


You do not convert your impulses through high engagement, therefore, you cannot see your reflection in the prospiration of your spirit, therefore, you naturally tend toward material reductionism, and conceive of the soul as something that is supposed to be cruder than it actually is, and of the self as being something more phantasmal than it actually is.

Verdict: you are spiritually deficient.

>>20430937


To miserable desolation is opposed melancholic consolation; you believe in the delusion of happiness, therefore, you stray from the perpetual reality of sorrow, and persist in psykhoemotional, multipolar instability.

>>20388944


To miserable desolation is opposed melancholic consolation; you believe in the delusion of happiness, therefore, you stray from the perpetual reality of sorrow, and persist in psykhoemotional, multipolar instability.

>>19812604

Because you lack solition, you are only capable of vesting your image in the reactions of others; stop striving to be a superfluous "man of the world".

>>19785925

Ok, but what do *you* do? you will not receive any reciprocation from divinty if you are pusillanimous toward adversity, and/or morbidly codependent; do you know your true form? what colour are your wings?

>>19785925

Ok, but what do *you* do? you will not receive any reciprocation from divinty if you are pusillanimous, and/or morbidly codependent; do you know your true form? what colour are your wings?

>>19651900
>Does anyone here feel like the sort of remarks, behaviors, attitudes and ideas you showed in the past are signs of the impossibility of you becoming a writer?

No; if you do not feel fondness for the earliest traces of your trek on the narrow path —if you even traverse it—, something is already wrong.

>>19503157
>What are some actual legitimate alternative paths to knowledge and intellectualism that differ from academia?

Intellectualism?

>>>/r/eddit


>I'm talking about developing one's one ideas while at the same time being surrounded by a group of interesting individuals that can challenge oneself.

It is year twothosand twentyone; there are no more universities, or anything like them, only globaria; currently, conversationally active sapient, and/or wise persons subsist in the penumbra of "4chan(nel)", and/or engage in martial pursuits; if you want to "challenge" yourself engage within the community of the former, or within any community that facilitates the latter.


>Academia, with al its problems, does facilitates an intellectual environment that is - from my knowledge - unmatched by any alternative non-academic path.

Learning to talk much about nothing is Prater Anselm's school, so you can also be on the lookout for him.

>>19444597

The only ones who "fall for memes" are delusional, confused, codependant individuals like yourself; telling them to immerse themselves in the apposite extreme will not rectify your/their deeprooted deficiency.

>>19444597

The only ones who "fall for memes" are delusional, confused, codependent individuals like you; telling them to immerse themselves in the opposite extreme will not rectify your/their deeprooted deficiency.

>>19370266

The default monological distillate of disintegral individuals.

>>19306581

By embracing their opposites; greater independence/autarky is conducive toward better introspection, which amplifies one's secernment; toward better introacton, which refines one's taste, thus facilitating subtler, implicatorial communication, and rendering unmediative dialogue superfluous.

The wholesome monologue is selfufficent.

>>18893658
>Examples of truth stranger than fiction?
The truth is always simple, although the path to it may be complex —complex ontology necessarily entails complex cordiology; fiction is necessarily firstly based on reality, and on the perspective of us humans, before it becomes itself, therefore, if the truth ever seems stranger than fiction to you then, either: it is actually a lie, or: you are overly distanced from the truth, from reality, and from yourself.

>>17874774
Intuition constitutes the subtle glimpse of affinity; in order to activate its prognostic potential you need to know yourself, and what you want/in what you are interested.

>>17820270
Translation:

>Any books for those who struggle with their christian faith because of lack of selfcertainty?

Selfcertainty, and faith, are mutually complementary; if you ignore your own nobility (derived from root: -gno) —the essence of your soul—, and, by extension, that of others, rather than build, and construct, your life from it, you will always remain in ignorance of God.

>Does not know how to, or is too lazy to, sublimate, and equalize, one's energy.
>Proceeds in a hyperactive mental state to attempt to engage in an activity that requires attention, focus, and/or concentration, and/or for which one lacks the prerequisite talent, or psykhic capability.
>Cannot do so; blames it on the symptoms, proceeds to seek out a selfhelp transciever vulgarly referred to as a: "therapist".

Et cetera.

>>16585496
Stop adopting religions, and, instead, focus on your own spirituality, and on those spiritutal doctrines with which you share affinity, or else you will remain in perpetual doubt of yourself, forcing to resign yourself to Judaic herding techniques.

Religion is to videogames what Spirituality is to sports.

>>16478014
>What's your strangest belief?
None of my beliefs are strange to myself.

Why are some of the posters who frequent this board so frightened of themselves? What can one who ignores one's own interests seek to read, and for what purpose?

>>16139349
>>16139383
Most individuals who claim that they fear death actually fear pain, and are averse to martial adventure, contrary to those ones who know pain, and, consequently, know themselves --through martial adventure-- and who welcome transition of worldly death.

The real rhetorical question is: when will unselfconscious individuals stop conflating the cause of their hatred with its effects in others, and projecting it on entire websites?

>>15490918
>What are some books that will give me a reason to live?
Books should serve to reaffirm, and to inform, one's preexistent reason, or purpose, for one's living, via aesthetical experience, and/or critical cogitation, not substitute it with an ephemeral impersonation.

Why are you so insecure?