/lit/ - Literature

>>12579721
Yeah I get what you are saying. There isn't really any *democracy* to be disappointed in, once the population gets too large, you might as well not have any say. (Modernist) fascism isn't as interesting to me as much as something like organic integeralism is, neofeudalism actually makes a bit of sense if you accept that large scale democracy is a sham. If you don't have the kind of say that matters, you should at least want the person telling you what to do / responsible for you politically, to be as competent as possible. The 21st century will be the century of competing fascism's: Chinese fascism, European fascism, Islamic fascism, Latin fascism, corporate fascism, we'll see which one wins in this post liberal era

In the near future, computer analysis and data collection have basically been perfected and the individual lives of people can, at least in the short term, to a high degree of accuracy. On a dare, a depressed programmer goes to one of the websites that you can use to interface with this system, enters his life history and learns that he will commit suicide within the next three years with 100% certainty. This plays into his previous insecurities and fears about himself and he eventually learns how to accept life for how it is. I'm not sure how the middle part of the story goes, but at the end, he does not kill himself and it is revealed that he is the victim of a secret government program intended to find out ways to assassinate foreign leaders with total plausible deniability. The protagonist goes full uncle Ted and tries to shoot up the agency behind the program but is quickly stopped and unceremoniously killed by the guards.

Last three climaxes have been to gay porn. Guess im bisexual now