/lit/ - Literature

>>20718344
>It's the only way you can train it...
No, it's a specific field of logic, the programming is limited by engineering which is physics, not logic, and by the market. Just learn maths.
>It's how astronomy like most science is usually taught. The history puts the concepts into perspective, it explains why anyone would ever think of needing idea x and what premises make it reasonable. Astronomy is the definitive science that other fields modeled themselves on. Careful observations combined with logic slowly built up a map of reality. Like 4 different types of observations line up to estimate a similar distance to a star that was predicted by previous models. Using that as a premise you infer other distances and times. Using those inferences you model more things that can be observed etc. The claim is not that the model is the truth, it's just a map. I can use the map to predict things so it gives me power over the world. If you have a better map you're more powerful. We can also map more abstract things and it also gives us power.

It's the link between astrology and science, the rest is just physics.
> ESS for example is from game theory. Game theory is abstract theory, biological evolution is observable. The abstract can limit you, the rules we can explore are what are relevant.
But why mention game theory specifically and in relation to biology??
> In philosophy it is. It's what made the walrus mad
Yes but I was talking about science. Aquinas of course could use it.