/lit/ - Literature

>"I love men too — not merely individuals, but every one.
>But I love them with the consciousness of egoism; I love them because love makes me happy, I love because loving is natural to me, because it pleases me.
>I know no 'commandment of love.' I have a fellow-feeling with every feeling being, and their torment torments, their refreshment refreshes me too; I can kill them, not torture them."
Most likely this.

Go find the oldest your oldest piece of writing that's 5+ pages long. Read it and post the part you liked best.

Did the man who invented spooks believe in spooks?

This is confusing.

On the one hand, "Freedom" is super important for Hegel and young Hegelians.
And Stirner is about freeing yourself form spooks too.
But Stirner also explicitly and lengthy argues against (some sort of) freedom. Freedom as a spook, I guess.

Guess: Is this where the opaque nothingness-stuff comes in?

>>6600292
fuck off idiot I have principles you know

How does the world the Ego creates for itself different than the pic up artists "frame"?

>>6442022

Based Sankt Max

>>6298289
I am the creative nothing beauty exists for me alone.

plus it suits my ends.

besides if you learn to read close retard there are no objective claims being made, but the allusion to "the aesthetic life" which is more or a name for a type of practice than it is an actual school

>>6298262
>implying any of that matters.
>implying you cant enjoy your physicality later in life
>implying bodybuilding is narcissism

>>6298266
my iq is 84 fagort not sub 80 cum at me bro

Can someone tell me about the relevancy of this Stirner guy? Is he considered an important figure in the history of philosophy?