/lit/ - Literature

>>14954019
You sound like one of those feminine faggots that is unable to find beauty in engineering marvels.

It would be so near impossible to not have terrible people exist
(partly because the variously relatively terrible people pleading their case with the persecution of an innocent or other)(the struggle of defining and enforcing, though it is done largely, and largely successfully to degrees already, as law)

Is a poor person more guilty for being poor than the committer of a white collar crime?

If power is currupt, if the system of justice is unjust, is that ok, is that ever good, acceptable? As long as its not hurting too many?

One of the largest reasons we might be interested in the events of the world, is because we believe some of them may be wrong, and we would like to see them righted?

Do we not mainly want everything to be alright?

But what would that take?

How many things, places, people right now are allright and will be, for how long?

How can we define alright, and agree on that definition?

I am interested in Truth, information, the world, importance, value/s, beliefs, arguments, discussions, right and wrong, justice and injustice, the variancies of power and the relative worthniesses of its desires, the relative justifications of complaints, problems and solutions, the arguments for what is and what should be.

Maybe some of what I wrote would inspire some conversation on any potential interesting topic


These statements and questions can be read in a minute or two, but every day and every hour, is full of life, and many lives all striving to flourish, to carve out their own space and tracks. The space of the reality of time and lifes action, desires, creations, and strivings.