/lit/ - Literature

I've been reading up this theory between contemporary "women hate", can somebody judge my summary?:

...A most obvious difference between men and women is the capabilities to bear children. And while a women maybe could in principle bear 30 children in her life, a man could father 30 children in a single day. On top of that, the time span in which a male is fertile is twice as long as the corresponding female one. Naively, one could wonder why the birth ratio of male and female babies is almost 50/50. The evolutionary answer is Darwinian fitness: more males make for a richer/healthier gene pool. While one man could impregnate all females in principle, in reality all man will compete for the possibility to bang, and this way desirable traits are favored.

The genetic game is implemented by some hard-wiring that determines nature of the different sexes:
Simply put, women are more picky about who gets to have intercourse with them, and men are better tailored for many physical actions. This is in part ensured on a chemical level through different hormone levels, which affect the brain. Importantly, less testosterone is leading to smaller average muscle grows and smaller sex drive. (The first thing women bodybuilder who jump on steroids notice is how they suddenly feel the need to get off more often.)

There will always be plenty of low value men eager to offer sex to a broad range of females, hence mere sex is easy accessible for many women, while it's a scarce good for many men. In turn, men are the sexes expected to demonstrate value, "Burden of performance":
To get sex, even a guy who is genetically blessed with above very good looks must take action. A fertile women in an environment filled by men can take a purely "reactionary" approach. This is the resulting sociological difference of how the "sexual market" presents itself to women vs. men. Naturally, from the inbalance stems a different evaluation of the role of intercourse, as perceived by men and women. From this, there also seems to stem a difficulty, in man and women, to emphasize with the other sex - to understand each others imperatives.

"A man would die for his family and a mother would die for her children. There are guys who cover their girlfriends with their bodies during shooting attacks. There are no women who give their life for their man." This is not a moral judgement, rather an expression of what presumably is the biological imperative. Women experiencing a Shakespearean love is a male fantasy.
"If a male lion is wounded by a younger stronger male, the defeated lions harem will leave him for the new lion." In fact, some animals even auto-abort their unborn children
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_effect
This translates to "If George Clooney (read `maximal status guy') comes along and shows interest in your girlfriend, then (unless bound to you by kids you already have) she will drop you for him."
Women only love the offspring and will try to get with the strongest lion.

Okay, I like you guys idea that "identity studies", are movements that break apart society into more distinct individuals and that might weaken them to act as one.

However, saying that this is bad is hopefully implying that capitalism is inferior to some other particular idea. What is that system?