/lit/ - Literature

>>4729564
Well the Nobles usually had what one would call wit or cleverness but were not "too deep" in theory and books as that comes from the Inversion of the Will to Power by the weak peoples of the Slave Morality.

You are too weak to master the external world and assert your Will to Power on others ? No problem you can invert that and master things "inside" such as your emotions or various theories (Buddhism, Science etc) and this is what makes the human animal so interesting says Nietzsche. ".

Is there really anything wrong if he objectively beautiful, healthy, adventerous nobles in possession of the Master Morality [Herrenmoral] take young and fruitful beautiful women for their pleasure ?

Wouldn't females objectively enjoy being penetrated by the most beautiful and gifted warriors if they are honest to the nature of the human animal ?

> In Homer young women are booty and are handed over to the pleasure of the conquerors, the handsomest being picked by the commanders in order of rank; the entire Iliad, it will be remembered, turns on the quarrel of Achilles and Agamemnon over one of these slaves. If a hero is of any importance, Homer also mentions the captive girl with whom he shares his tent and his bed.

In such an arrangement not good for both sexes in the end ?

Edgy feminazis need not reply.