[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.11877701 [View]
File: 202 KB, 1200x1080, 1535382473046.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11877701

Guys, something terrible happened. I visited /his/, I'm still recovering.

Please, post non-shit history books.

>> No.11824707 [View]
File: 196 KB, 1200x1080, stirner.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11824707

>> No.11690696 [View]
File: 196 KB, 1200x1080, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11690696

>>11690637
We will never survive if we do not unite under the anti-spook banner, anons.

>> No.11690667 [View]
File: 196 KB, 1200x1080, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11690667

>> No.10897809 [View]
File: 196 KB, 1200x1080, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10897809

You need to visit Dr. Stirner, he can help you with your problem.

>> No.10195283 [View]
File: 213 KB, 1200x1080, 098FD156-50C3-4DE7-BF0B-10B53941E69C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10195283

tfw you arent pro modernism or anti modernism, but un-modern

>> No.10104376 [View]
File: 196 KB, 1200x1080, stirner2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10104376

>>10104361
>We think of each other as human beings as an abstract concept a priori
That's literally the fucking opposite of what he's saying. Again, from "Stirner's Critics":
'One flattered oneself that one spoke about the “actual, individual” human being when one spoke of the human being; but was this possible so long as one wanted to express this human being through something universal, through an attribute? To designate this human being, shouldn’t one, perhaps, have recourse not to an attribute, but rather to a designation, to a name to take refuge in, where the view, i.e., the unspeakable, is the main thing? Some are reassured by “real, complete individuality,” which is still not free of the relation to the species; others by the “spirit,” which is likewise a determination, not complete indeterminacy. This indeterminacy only seems to be achieved in the unique, because it is given as the specific unique being, because when it is grasped as a concept, i.e., as an expression, it appears as a completely empty and undetermined name, and thus refers to a content outside of or beyond the concept. If one fixes it as a concept — and the opponents do this — one must attempt to give it a definition and will thus inevitably come upon something different from what was meant. It would be distinguished from other concepts and considered, for example, as “the sole complete individual,” so that it becomes easy to show it as nonsense. But can you define yourself; are you a concept?'

>Its thinking only of yourself in the context of others , who are accessories for your enjoyment
Do you spend time with people you detest to spend time with? I am only friends with people I enjoy

>> No.9128077 [View]
File: 196 KB, 1200x1080, stirner2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9128077

>>9127987
>>9128049
>>9128066
>intentionally suffering a relationship in order to "Encourage Reading"

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]