/lit/ - Literature

>>20540746
please go back wherever you came from. alternatively read some books so you having something relevant to contribute to /lit/ - Slower Moving /pol/ & /r9k/ Threads

>>19180323
>what can I reasonably hope to get out of reading him
Modified Kant and Plato with a pinch of Indian monism, frequent contempt for Hegel, proto-Nietzschean aphorisms, consistent anti-abrahamism

Let go of all your stupid notions, starting with your post.

>>18800379
The primacy of individualism in western neoliberal governance is the rope it has used to hang itself.

>>18582031

>>18548563
What a succulent piece of meat.

>>18525066
>another thread for people who haven't read Schopenhauer to debate people who didn't understand him about whether it is based and redpilled to agree with him or not

You don't.

>>18482088
Sorry I'm not one of your tradzoom bible citing friends. You can go read WWR. But even without a citation it should be obvious that desire of the will is linked to sexuality. Even the way a bureaucrat fondles his papers. Psychology for that matter is an outgrowth of vague metaphysics by the way. You can't measure a mind. But what you can do, in a very sort of archaeological way, is try to uncover what the base motivations are behind actions, what sort of conditions someone is acting from, what incomplete or misformed picture is being used by the subject to evaluate and so forth. I won't go as far as to agree with all of Freud or Schopey, but if you have any intention of being more literate you should be familiar with them.

This gets posted every day.

Consider yourself refuted

>>18381744
Really the best parts of Schopenhauer are where he is ranting about how much he hates Hegel.

>>18373098
Stupid tourist

>>18363663
they are leaving because they are being pushed to a marginalized state

men are second-class citizen in today society