/lit/ - Literature

>>12023193
Does it only count if I publish content related to my notes, studies and analysis? Is having them not enough? Do you need to see some citations?

In a way, these few shitposts reflect an understanding and perspective on an often misunderstood artistic medium. This encouragement of others to see an avenue of historic/religious literature in a different way is in some way academic in nature, is it not?

Or is what is 'academical' so strictly held? Does it need to be published in a journal of some sort for you to think critically about it? Is reading and analyzing history and art not an academic study?

What is the bar for 'anything academical'? And why did you call me a cunt just for asking?

Maybe you should check out >>12023004
>Bear with your own problems and don't bother other people too much with them, Don't be a slob, Be open to listening to other people's ideas, but never take any man's word for granted, it is better to leave a positive legacy than a negative one.

Truly, these are words of wisdom.

>>10255889
and the thing that made you think we're nothing but piles of cells is nothing but a pile of cells itself. the boundaries of comprehension aren't the boundaries of reality nor are they the best place to build your understanding of your microcosm of reality from.
It helps no one to be so reductive.
In fact, given the mentality of the tumblrina who linked their blog in this thread, it's self-destructive to reduce human interaction to mere 'rearrangements of other piles of cells which are always merging and separating in a transient and inexorable way.'
It's not a philosophical stance, it's a philosophical symptom of a myopic social-outcast and/or the mentally ill.
You're not woke or redpilled; you're just a loser.