/lit/ - Literature

for non politicizeable stuff it can be very good, that's about it, I stopped donating years ago when it became obvious which direction it took, IIRC even one of the founders lamented it
I saved pic a while ago because it reads like a parody

>>20162689
Not everything can be proven by studies. Find me any wikipedia article on a political topic and we can look at Talk page and see what type of things the mods like to discuss. The fact that you would even argue that Wikipedia isn't run by leftists shows either how retarded or intellectually dishonest you are and just proves that I'm right in everything I say.

>>19136081
Too based for normies, who mock and belittle that which they can not comprehend

>>18978376
>I've skimmed through and it seems really interesting.
Kind of answered your own question.

>>18949444
I don't agree with Evola on anything but I know that he's not just a meme.

>>18305832
Nazi's and other adjacent people don't even care about capital T Traditionalism, at most they pay lip service to Evola and can't name any other authors. And even the ones that can name Evola arguably know less about him than the people who do pic related.

>>18130471
holy shit
fuck you, you fucking faggot

good thread
also reminder that normies still try to portray him in the "worst light" possible

>>18036003

>>17903089
>wikipedia

>>17821636
>So saying "convicted terrorist" is a half truth.
There's a thousand different quotes talking about her they could have taken as the main argument to be examined. But they chose the specific one that allowed them to reach the specific conclusion that allowed them to bend reality in a specific light. Why wasn't the assertion they used "Susan Rosenburg was once part of a violent left wing terrorist organization that was responsible for bombing federal buildings"? They didn't use that because then they couldn't pull out their bullshit "mixture" conclusion because then they couldn't waffle it over some pedantic "but it's not true according to THIS definition" bullshit.

Pure fucking propaganda.

>>17712135
Evola is/was a very respected philosopher but feminist couldn't handle him.

>>17709040
>I would just point out that the pages on Michelstaedter and Bachofen were less than a quarter of the length
It's mostly the huge amount of references at the bottom of Evola's which take up a large amount of space. Not to mention that Evola gets focused on by trannies (see pic related) due to /pol/, which does not imply popularity.
>Gentile was very influential, if not outright famous.
99% of people I talk to wouldn't know who he is, just like Evola.

>>17619184

>>17515538
>>17515541
It's not just here.

>>17390928
>His wiki used to be good, but then at some point a few years ago they revised it to be full of attacks on him because he became somewhat popular on /pol/.
Many such cases.

>>16774112
Because of stuff like pic related

>>16672302

Fuck Wikipedia
/thread

>>14317748
>reading the wikipedia articles doctored by jews now that Evola has become more mainstream in dissident academia
How are you this naive!?

>>13609666
Cry more faggot

What do you mean?