[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.14138270 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 29 KB, 684x1243, d3b84d42c96abecfa0a6cdde5b7fe451-imagejpeg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14138270

It would be greatly beneficial for Christendom if all schismatic denominations were reconciled into the universal church without necessarily resolving the theological disputes that cause them to be divergent. Though the idea may sound radical, it is not without historical precedent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_of_Brest
>It was agreed that the filioque should not be inserted in the Nicene Creed, and that the Ruthenians "should remain with that which was handed down to us in the Holy Scriptures, in the Gospel, and in the writings of the holy Greek Doctors, that is, that the Holy Spirit proceeds, not from two sources and not by a double procession, but from one origin, from the Father through the Son."


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molinism
>In 1581, a heated argument erupted between the Jesuits, who advocated Molinism, and the Dominicans, who had a different understanding of God's foreknowledge and the nature of predestination. In 1597, Pope Clement VIII established the Congregatio de Auxiliis, a committee whose purpose was to settle this controversy. In 1607, Pope Paul V ended the quarrel by forbidding each side to accuse the other of heresy, allowing both views to exist side-by-side in the Catholic Church.

The Orthodox and high church Protestants could likewise exist in full Communion with the Catholic church without delving into and resolving the specifics of divisive theological divergences.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]