/lit/ - Literature

>I'M BECOOOOMING

>There is no eternal nature. Everything is in motion.

What does this actually mean? Is this just ancient postmodernism or is there a deeper message?

>praying to a God is no better than praying to the side of a house. You'll never be answered from either.

Was he right?

I have come to the conclusion, from helpful anons in this thread and my prior thoughts on the topic, that Heraclitus' philosophy subsumes the system -- his systematic process which I had held initially to be his philosophy at the point of starting this thread -- and because of this is so much more. It is a genuine relation to human experience and nature in itself, the first of metaphysics, an aesthetic self-revelation which must define rather than be defined any further than it is capable in itself, -- as it is a character, a Spirit -- right or wrong.

It offers a truth to man which does not depend on its literal application, as has surely been seen and understood by the reading of this statement.

>tfw too obscure

Stopping is just starting a different thing.