[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.16205359 [View]
File: 362 KB, 741x915, 1863b-Paris-Hachette-01-001-f-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16205359

man, he's just like me

>> No.15680885 [View]
File: 362 KB, 741x915, Quixote01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15680885

>18
>Book of Disquiet
>San Manuel Bueno, Martyr
>Darío by Darío (An Anthology of Rubén Darío)
>Meditations
>Sorrows of Young Werther

Don Quixote, Ficciones, The Sun Also Rises, Ecclesiastes, et al.

>> No.13505336 [View]
File: 362 KB, 741x915, 25669501743_f164cf1f45_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13505336

>23
>NEET
>idk
>Don Quijote

>> No.9585883 [View]
File: 301 KB, 741x915, 25669501743_f164cf1f45_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9585883

i remember being able to picture what i read more vividly when i was younger and had just started to read often.
now i have to think much more to picture what i read and i get only a "schematic" view of what the authors wrote because for years i've been focusing on getting the "musicality" of the texts to a point that literature kind of become for me a mostly sound-related activity.
i'm able to imagine sounds and get how the authors intended their onomatopoeias to sound, but i rarely read literature that relies ond sounds. a lot, in the other hand, relies a lot on pictures. the poet creates a picture and then procceeds to reflect on it. i try to understand the reflections, but i'm often not able to picture vividly the images.
does anybody know this feel?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]