[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.20445448 [View]
File: 375 KB, 792x475, 1653784964836.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20445448

>>20438027
Bakker

>> No.12814628 [View]
File: 375 KB, 792x475, 1552861303176.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12814628

>>12807222

>> No.10421116 [View]
File: 375 KB, 792x475, 1511366604837.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10421116

>>10419831
>"Stay Golden Pony Boy"
>I made a The Outsiders reference at work

>> No.10301241 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 375 KB, 792x475, 1496975281745.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10301241

Why is it that in every philosophical thread on /lit/, it's just pseudo intellectuals talking around philosophy and literature but never actually discussing it? I've never seen anyone actually explain or attempt to discuss something itself; it's always just vague references to ideas or authors, with unnecessarily complex jargon.

Why?

>> No.9984177 [View]
File: 375 KB, 792x475, 1504361722929.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9984177

>reading highly-regarded introduction to Husserl
>"Husserl was a Berkeleyan subective idealist"
>reading highly-regarded introduction to Merleau-Ponty
>"Merleau-Ponty was a Berkeleyan subective idealist"
>reading highly-regarded introduction to Heidegger
>"Heidegger was a Berkeleyan subective idealist"
>reading highly-regarded introduction to Deleuze
>"Deleuze was a Berkeleyan subective idealist"

>> No.9739801 [View]
File: 375 KB, 792x475, 1497208848193.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9739801

>>9738093
>everything I don't like is nihilism

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]