/lit/ - Literature

Once again we're dangerously close to having an antinatalism thread without once invoking antifrustrationism, which is the heart of the matter.

It throws out most prescriptive "objections" (as if kys was a rational objection) and puts the argument in the mouths of toasters. Toasters can't kill themselves. Not yet anyway.

It boils down to this; Why create a preference to be satisfied where before there was none? Answer that in good faith and you'll shut the fuck out of the up of the antinatlists for good.

>>21675337
It shows leeway in his position, therefore the position itself, on the sanctity of human life.
I understand its hard for some people to look beyond a surface level "argument," but its something that intelligent people have to do all the time. In a way I envy you.
It must be a relief to believe everything can be plotted on a truth table.

>>21637442
see >>21637465
Every antinatalist is the product of two natalists.

If a thought needs mountains of corroborating documentation to explain, its probably a cope.

>>21308219
>Almost always an attempt to universalize and turn their personal experience of depression into a metaphysical principle.
I love the new meme argument. Second time I've seen it today, first time on this board. I can't wait to find out which youtube intellectual spun this sack of midwit gold. If its just a Peterson line I'll be disappointed.