/lit/ - Literature

thoughts? the "disabled by living" idea creeps me. I haven't read it (yet) though.

>>19135188
I'm surprised at all the snarky seething you're getting for this. /lit/ really must be overrun with normalfags and redditors
Anyway, I reccomend pic rel. While the book's criticisms are focussed on Psychiatry specifically a lot of the message can be extrapolated into the grander trend of things. The basic point is that social morality and ethics are subjects independent of science. People trying to make normative claims on tbe basis of science are not actually practicing science. There are absolutely totalitarian forces trying to hijack the supposed objectivity of science to act as if their normative claims are settled. It's total horseshit.

>>19051100
Refuted

>>19000540
I know this is a troll but it should be pointed out that medicine and psychiatry are incapable of providing an objective basis for affirming any kind of behavior

>mental illness isn't real
Lel tell that to the voices in a schizos head