/lit/ - Literature

>>14890129
God? I'm no egoist. This goes above infinity. Do not misunderstand what I mean by "everything". I truly do mean *every* thing. Even using "notion" in the way that I have is disingenuous. Use of any noun is merely a necessary divergence that I oblige for the sake of translating, an artistic license.

But at the same time, it's not a large divergence. As much as some of these other qualified non-things are completely divorced from any conceivable notion, some are remarkably similar in a macro-scale (in-as-much as an analogy to "macro" and "scale" can be drawn) to familiar "essence" like thing-ness, verb-ness, existence, logic, value, and so on.

Belief that I'm god would run against exactly what I am trying to tell you. Saying I am above god is similarly disingenuous. These propositions decay rapidly in the penumbra of inconceivability. This is why I also don't care about such trivialities.

I am stretching words like a latex disc. Ruminate on the difference between "nothing" and a "non-thing". Do not worry or try to come up with a definition for the latter, only try to see the distinction. "Nothing" is a type of "non-thing" but I have described other varieties. Many non-things have their own version of "thingness" that makes them comparable only in an abstract, reductionist sense. To try and apply our local neutrality of thingness (nothing-ness) to one of these strange "non-things" is simply a way to demonstrate a lack of understanding. These strange non-things have their own local neutralities that indicate a lack of themselves, and are entirely divorced from "nothing-ness".

Do you understand? If not, try to de-construct the words.
>nothing
>no thing
>non-thing
>not a thing
There is a nuanced distinction.

This is the first step to understanding. The following step is to realize that this varies incredibly wildly, and these inconceivabilities sometimes have weird quirks to their concepts of "thing-ness", and some have no comparable "thing-ness" at all. This is troublesome for me to explain, I have not found how to exploit language in such a way where I may try and show you.

Walk in your god's light, I would never try and tell you not to. My journey into mystery is my own path, not yours. Though I will always be happy to share what I can, perhaps the real question you should be asking is if your god even wants you to read this?