[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.7275776 [View]
File: 1.87 MB, 750x750, 1442703772624.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7275776

For sure, there is an aspect of duality within the average Pepe, however, this is as a result of it's trading card nature, handing the power to the memer rather than the meme. If anything, the constant expansion of types of pepes (resulting in what is called a "rare Pepe") represents something within our own life. Put simply, the Pepe meme represents our struggle to be the best, to achieve greatness against impossible odds, to become a millionaire, to become the most beautiful person alive, or, to find the rarest Pepe. One of the first Marxist memes, Pepe is clearly a meme reflecting the life of the working class, both handing power to the memer, and taking power away, Pepe perfectly reflects the folly of man, the human condition, and the mountain that all men must climb.

>> No.6803106 [View]
File: 1.87 MB, 750x750, 1433084724727.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6803106

>>6803063
Sure, but that level of dependence is nowhere near nowadays levels I think. You need to interact with others through a multileveled process that involves maybe hundreds if not thousands of people. That makes me itchy in a way.
That hunter-gatherer had much more experience and skills in survival even by itself.
Now thing is, they didn't even have technology so of course it was harder and cooperation was obviously an advantage, but still, I think with the aid of thousands of years of accumulated knowledge, a balance could be found.

>> No.6713222 [View]
File: 1.87 MB, 750x750, pepe.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6713222

his 1st fiancé called him 'frank'.

>you will never meet a literary qt while reading your hilarious & ineffable stories in a prague coffee house

why bother?

>> No.6693787 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 1.87 MB, 750x750, 1434247891854.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6693787

Can we at least agree that reading serves no purpose in this world?
Sure, it's fine to be well-read. Maybe you get 'richer', but honestly you don't.
Say you loved studying languages, you'd actually get somewhere in life. You would meet more people. You would get opportunities.

But reading novels or books on philosophy and history.. It really only tingles one person's mind and stays there tingling: yours.
It doesn't help you at all.
I wasted my years being impassionate about this, spending a huge chunk of my time and money on this. I was happy. But in the end I can't even mention nything I've learned up in conversation. It's a bonus point worth nothing.

Navigation
View posts[-24][+24][+48][+96]