[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.9403267 [View]
File: 27 KB, 361x499, 419mUkpBOIL._SX359_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9403267

>>9403252
I'm also reading pic related, just finished the new testament recently, already read genesis-deuteronomy but now i'm going to reread it and finish the old testament

>> No.9382948 [View]
File: 27 KB, 361x499, 419mUkpBOIL._SX359_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9382948

>> No.9298495 [View]
File: 27 KB, 361x499, 419mUkpBOIL._SX359_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9298495

Not OP but is this a good version to start with?

>> No.9282194 [View]
File: 35 KB, 361x499, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9282194

I just orderd this. Did i fuck up?

>> No.9196786 [View]
File: 27 KB, 361x499, 419mUkpBOIL._SX359_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9196786

>> No.8918337 [View]
File: 27 KB, 361x499, 007A45CA-66B0-4463-8A2C-1B2545ADFD43-21830-000017A949529BC5_tmp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8918337

>>8918266
Got pic related for Christmas and I'm loving it so far. The language isn't as poetic as the King James but the introductions and extensive notes more than make up for it.

>> No.8211305 [View]
File: 27 KB, 361x499, noab.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8211305

I have been taking an interest in academic Bible study for some time now, and I keep seeing the both of these recommended for their mainstream scholarly commentary.

Can anyone help me decide between the two? I am very racist and sexist, and I hear that New Oxford Annotated is "inclusive to people of color" and "gender neutral". Is this true for both of them? Is there a study Bible that keeps homosexuality as the primary reason Sodom was destroyed?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]