/lit/ - Literature

Evola
Evola
Evola

>tfw no Evola vs Zizek debate

Why did he have to go, lads

>>12141695
At the ripe age of 14, a 22 year old girl with ample bosom and starkly dyed red hair invited me over to watch a film. We had talked a lot prior to this, and bonded over some mutual interests such as bands and video games. My taste was juvenile and plebeian, but it suited well with her own.

When I entered her apartment after having taken the train for twenty minutes to her house, it smelled very strongly of dog urine. She asked if it smelled, and I responded negatively. She sighed and lead me to her bedroom.

It was a mess. Her bed was a barren, sheetless mattress lying upon the carpeted floor - all around were magazines, video games and other assorted nonsense. She said to sit down on the mattress, and I did as she said, expecting for her to turn on the television in her room and to put on a film. She immediately sat on my lap and faced directly toward me, and began kissing my neck. It was the most incredible pleasure that I had ever experienced at that point in my life - I immediately fell into a trance of ecstasy, unable to control myself whatsoever. I fell back into the mattress and she began kissing me all over and removing articles of clothing. I took my leather jacket off, and she pushed my long black hair out of my eyes. She remarked that the makeup that I wore (white foundation, eyeliner, some light red lipstick) was beautiful and that it made her feel inadequate. It was at this time that I looked to my right and saw upon the wall numerous drawings of men and boys fitting my description. I asked her who they were and she replied by saying that they were her ex boyfriends, and that I needn't worry about them. After minutes of kissing, she asked if I'd like to have sex. I said that I wasn't ready to do that, and she said that she had had a miscarriage after being impregnated, and that she wanted to get pregnant again. I said nothing and she took off my pants and began to lick at my underwear. I removed my underwear and she sucked my penis for well over half an hour before I ejaculated into her mouth and she swallowed it. I think that I may have kissed her afterwards. We got out of bed after an hour, and I put on my clothes and walked back to the train station, confused.

As a librarian, there is basically nothing that I can do to stop you from borrowing a book and never returning it.

However, please bring back good books - classics, philosophy, even history. We are so starved for classics, the entire library system is rigged against them. We throw them out tirelessly and import terrible genre fiction and romance novels on a daily basis; we are not even allowed to put classics on display because they don't have pretty stickers like all of the new books.

Please, Anons, bring back the good ones.

The Kali Yuga will consume you too edition
>Thread for discussing the ideas and books of thinkers associated with the Traditionalist school, sometimes also known as the Perennialist school. Including but not limited to:
- Rene Guenon
- Martin Lings
- Seyyed Hossein Nasr
- Frithjof Schuon
- Ananda K. Coomaraswamy
- Julius Evola
- Titus Burckhardt
- Philip Sherrard
- Marco Pallis etc
>Also thinkers indirectly affiliated, influenced by, or similar to Traditionalism:
- Henry Corbin
- William Chittick
- Mircea Eliade
- Arthur Avalon
- Ernst Juenger etc

Yo we're having Traditional General, that means Evola, Jünger, Spengler, and Eliade.

Scriptures from religions are welcome, but know that Abrahamism will be looked down upon.

This is NOT a Perennialist thread, as such Guenon, Schuon, and Coomaraswamy are not the main subjects of focus here but are allowed. Serrano is allowed too, Devi is not.

Topic for the thread:
Solar vs. Lunar, what does it mean to you?

>>11198712
>implying
I have a full bookshelf nig

>>11115213
mad, are we

>>11094347
see you, have fun fetshising magic

The Mystery of the Grail, Metaphysics of Sex, and Metaphysics of War.

I'm tired of all the airy, lofty rhetoric. What do conservatives actually advocate for and why do you think it's better than the status quo?

I'm all for romanticizing the feudal ages and chivalric aristocracies, but to uproot men from their common historical institutions, to shove them into the crowded suburban industrial sectors, expose them to environmental catastrophes, moral decadence and the secular irregularity, then proceed to deny those same men the right and need to flourish within that system, however aberrational, seems to me to be a kind of despotism.

Traditional art may have been the "poor man's book," and the artisan guild the nucleus of religious worship, political adoption and monetary sustenance, but to tear down the old walls and impose a new system of democracy, literacy, and wage-labor upon men and then proceed to strip them the rights of education, representation, and the audience to negotiate their needs, seems to me to be an even grosser monstrosity than the revolution itself

What I'm saying is that a monarchist yesterday may find himself by a turn of irony aligning with the liberal today vis-a-vis social welfare and the right of representation. A removed, abstract fawning over any type of planned system is antithetical to the conservative spirit

>>8865152
Yes, let's ask the guy who believed in hyperboreans for economic policy

>>8728309
>Leaving the jacket on
I bet you're uncircumcised as well