/lit/ - Literature

>>9759363
Wrong

But can he define empirical?

The real question is continental or analytic?

Okay, kids, now that Trump is president I can post whatever I want. Continental or analytic. Solve it once and for all.

Are there any good books that critique post-modernism/post-structrualism/post-alllthatshit? Preferably from the left but as long as its intellectually serious I'd like to see it.

>>8760046
This

What kind of a search for truth is region-specific? Absolute nonsense.

>>8708105
>>8708090
But Chomsky doesn't do that! He's empirical!

>21 century
>still bothering with continentals

>>7424675

For my part, I agree with Buddha as I have imagined him. But I do not know how to prove that he is right by any argument such as can be used in a mathematical or a scientific question. I dislike Nietzsche because he likes the contemplation of pain, because he erects conceit into a duty, because the men whom he most admires are conquerors, whose glory is cleverness in causing men to die. But I think the ultimate argument against his philosophy, as against any unpleasant but internally self-consistent ethic, lies not in an appeal to facts, but in an appeal to emotions. Nietzsche despises universal love; I feel it the motive power to all that I desire as regards the world. His followers have had their innings, but we may hope that it is coming rapidly to an end.

Analytic of course.

>>6945657
Sorry, i'm a philosopher. I don't read unsubstantiated bullshit.

That quote is actually indecipherable from most continental nonsense

Analytic of course.

Fiction is for muh feels, not philosophy.

>>6653101
Hear, hear

>>6078801
Okay anon.

Continentals pls go