/lit/ - Literature

>>20112508
>This is interesting but I think it's a conclusion that can't be come to logically, per se, since this third-party 'origin' appears purely speculative and probably must exist outside of reality.

I didn't write this as a proof only as an artistic representation of what I had been getting at earlier because I will be the first to admit I am not good with rhetoric. However, to even acknowledge its existence be it as it may out of typical reality would imply the possibility the super-real.

>Sure. The original 'urge,' or primary 'cause' behind cognition (or any process whatever) is basic physical properties. Gravity, the strong and weak nuclear forces, magnetism, these are what impel life, fundamentally. Cognition and behavior exist downstream of these properties.

Do you see what I mean? The original urge which you have noted exist neither downstream nor upstream of physicality because the urge (mental) has no space and thus cannot impart force upon the physical (body) and vice versa. It is only rational that they occur in tandum (psychophysical parralelism) due to an entirely external force unless you think both are mental

>>20112537
How much further fren?

>>20112511
>>20112519
Its ok. thank you

I am increasingly leaning towards a disciplinarian, moralistic, law and order frame of mind, but whenever I reach for conservative literature which claims to uphold these values in order to give this instinct depth and a theoretical refinement I just find it all so terrible and shallow that I even start doubting my own political intuition and blaming it for putting me anywhere near these people.

It really is no wonder that right-wingers usually become this mishmash of retarded libertarian, religious, tribalistic and conspiratorial ideas that they just oscilate between without any regard for inner consistency, there is no coherent framework out there to work with.

This board is wack, writing books is gay. I'm going to re-learn mathematics from scratch and go full /sci/ and /g/ autism.

Recommend me some right-wing history books, or history books that are not explicitly political but contains information a right-wing person would find useful or enlightening.

>>13719358
Wish there was.

>>13719402
>immune to the post-modern critics.
No one is immune to the claws of postmodernity

>>13190629
The only good post in this thread. You're all cucks to your rich overlords. Now go die and pretend that you're doing something good. You'll get a bland headstone and be forgotten like the rest. Only you'll have all the niceties of life cut short.