/lit/ - Literature

>mfw Sartre, Foucault, Deleuze, Virilio, Guattari, Badiou, and Lyotard were all active participants in activist groups and street demonstrations

>mfw Foucault actively threw shit at police while screaming insults like a madman and got his head bashed in, resulting in a scar that was visible for the rest of his life

>mfw Virilio was an active key player in the taking of the Odeon theater during May '68 and spend about a month in hiding from the police

>mfw the entire first generation of the so-called "bourgeous postmodern Marxist fops" clique were active participants in May '68

>mfw Baudrillard and Guattari were part of the same Maoist radical group

>mfw Guy Debord in general

>mfw they all failed because the French consumer class didn't give a fuck and the Police just flat-out beat them

>mfw Zizek actually ran for President of Slovenia to the point of making it to the televised debates (no really, look up the footage, it's in the documentary on the guy)

>mfw Negri was in fucking exile because he got accused of leading the Red goddamn Brigades, because that's how much his writing managed to piss off the closet leftover fascists in Italy

>mfw they get called bourgeois academic Marxist fops who don't really give a fuck and never did anything to actually try and help the people who needed them by edgy undergrad posters who don't know their history and just can't get over the fact that we leftists just flat-out lost, deal with it kiddos

OP here. Waiting for more strawman arguments about "reading slow helping comprehension".

Jesus.

Here's a metaphor - by regularly jogging in the morning you can probably walk longer distances at a faster pace than someone who doesn't. It does not mean YOU HAVE TO RUN ALL THE TIME. Nobody said so.

How hard is this to understand???

>>3405326
>as dependant as possible

>>3046348
>>3046357
>>3046371
>>3046375
>>3046389
>>3046404
>>3046493
>>3049356
>>3049359

Lets count redundant shit posts. Count them 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9

9! 9 shit posts all either saying or written by the same ass-hat that was to force his view that writing about the physical descriptions of sex through sense is irrelevant to his or her puritan sensibilities and though has been expressed in RATIONAL TERMS that this thread isn't for them keep posting the same useless shit! Please keep shit posting!

Fuck you very much.

>>2880889

When did I say that?

>>2802321

Those links are necessary, they've provided a better introduction into /lit/. The recommended books section is simply another form of, my taste > your taste. Considering /lit/ is filled with, who I would categorize as your usual, liberal egalitarian New York crowd, how do we trust the judgement of those pseudo intellectuals and read their recommended shit ?

>>2653027