/lit/ - Literature

> arguing over subjective opinions
> 2012

inb4 durrr movies are objective.

p.s.

fuck you all.

>>2428837
>>2428835

change "thread" with "board".

This board is a place for literature discussion worse than the 1 star reviews section of Amazon books' pages.

>>2312694
>Keeping CAPSGUY, because why not

i don't know whats more retarded, op or the people trying to answer his question.

>>1981598

Fuck you and your spoilers.

>advices

>>1570793

No Pynchon, Roth, Saramago, Rushdie, Llosa?

Fuckin hell, this thread is still HERE the next day?

*reads*

Well at least she decided not to do it.

Speaking from experience, anybody thinking about suicide:

There's not much I can say against it that you probably haven't already read in response, except that if you're thinking/asking about it, you probably don't really want to take your life. You're just tired of being miserable.

But unless you're a deaf-mute quadriplegic, you are never at a point where you cannot -- rather than take your own life -- wash your hands of it, walk away, and change it completely.

If the problems are internal, there's nothing about yourself that you can't -- if not 'fix' -- at least make better.

You CAN be happy.
You will be.
What it takes is a sincere desire to be, and forward movement from there.


Also: know that a botched suicide attempt is pretty much the worst thing you can conceivably put your friends/family through. And don't tell me you don't have any family or friends. I call shenanigans.

Now then.

Pic related.

>>1485677

ITT: OP no longer wanting to discuss his idea, and now judging everyone's belief's

I think there is a reason this board is so fucking dead. You asswipes discourage anyone who isn't interested into your little circle jerk from posting consistently. I mean I could have asked this question on any other board and, while someone would evidentially post some faggotry, would still get an answer. This board fucking sucks.

>>1294840
>>1294835

I've come to the conclusion that /lit/ hates books.

You are the book version of /v/, /lit/.

>>761325

WHAT THE FUCKING FUCK IS "BLACK PEOPLE LITERATURE"? I thought we'd decided not to group African Americans and Africans. Also, "I could go on but why bother... you get it"? Sorry, Anon, I don't. Get what? That black-skinned people can write? And the chart is supposed to prove a point rather than, as the other charts attempt to, list the essentials of the literature of a certain group of people?

"Why bother?" Because someone wanted to know more about the canon of African American literature. And then more people agreed it was needed on this board. "Why bother?" Fuck, chartfag, are you kidding me?

this thread is now about how /lit/ is the new /b/