/lit/ - Literature

Because everything else is corrupted by the moralizers.

This book is not read. It is studied and applied.

Trial and error until you understated it.


Heidegger didn't write the follow up that was supposed to destroy metaphysics.

You have to do it yourself and fill in the blanks. Language is limited in its ability to enlighten - you must absolutely experience.

All the reviews and interpretations are wrong. Heidegger tries to do something else entirely.

If true then the technological framework is not technological but consumption based and thus based on marketing. And marketing is a frame of illusion. Plato's cave.

where should I start with Heidegger

that's a bit harder than the other thread
>>15298302
I'd say this hack

>>14163912
>>14163914
>>14163923
Sometimes, I wonder why I start such threads. It's just a shame that a man who thought so deeply about Being and about man and what he has become in modern times to be treated with such contempt that comes from a shallow understanding of his life and tought. Yes, I know these are bait, but these posts represent the absolute state of /lit/. Anyway, if this thread dies, I will start another tomorrow, maybe.

Where to start with continental philosophy?