/lit/ - Literature

>>22493866
I bear no such ill intent, all I wish is to learn.

>>16409030
No worries.

nothing, except learning Homeric/Attic Greek isn't as useful as Koine

>>13662941
Okay I lol'd

>>13560188
I download them in pdf format and read them on tablet.

Is there any guide to taking notes? I read mostly in my paperwhite and I just underline key points or passages that I liked and read them later to freshen up my memory.
Is it the correct way? What do you write in your notes lads? help a brainlet out.

>i'm not on this list
feels good brehs

big cofe

I read 12 pages today!

>>12614118
>No, I'm asking you how you think you could gain something worth a lifetime of labor for 50 people laboring at average productivity if the state wasn't enforcing your market position. New value only comes from labor, and capital is the purest form of distilled labor. Only a monopoly on violence can allow you to accumulate that much of it.
What about invention ? Or imporving the produciton ? Or just find a way to produce with more efficiency ?
>Money has no stable value without either a central authority pegging it to some commodity or the currency itself having some use value.
This is the reason crypto is a joke, and the vast majority of people that have it just use it for speculation.
Just watch a currency chart of the euro. I think it was like 1.60 dollar is 1 euro and the low was like 0.8 dollar is 1 euro currencys arent even stable with the goverment. You could also look at the gold price or something like that.
>Yeah, you call me a statist in one breath and an anarchist the next. You should scroll up and try reading again if you think anyone is advocating Maoism.
The nuclear family also can't function as an instrument of social repression without the state and capital. If you're a child abuser, your kid will just fucking leave and there won't be a state to play childcatcher for you.
From what you saying i would suppose that you are an anchro communist or something like this...
>The state isn't a higher level of human development. Living under a boot isn't progress. We left the imperial state after Rome for a time, and it was an improvement. The free federation of European villages run by cooperative guilds and the federation of small city states in ancient Greece, although neither completely without government, both represent better organic social arrangements than the statist empires of Rome and the US.
Rome was more advanced then the next 1000 years that came after it in europe so please dont come with this bullshit.


I think we wont come to a point we have drifted to far away from the topic. Can we try another approach ? Just tell me what you think a perfect state would look like and I tell you what a perfect state would look like. We can compare and please dont try to be to Utopic.
Thank you <3.