/lit/ - Literature

>>7195703
>>7195722
Its written by a 17 year old high school girl.
Of course its shit.

However, nothing can top pic related (written by a fucking 15 year old).

No? no one cares about Eragon? No one cares about dragon books then huh? No one?

So, I know the /lit/ doesn't exactly like Harry Potter, but one series I never see mentioned is the Eragon books.
What does /lit/ think of Eragon?

So tell me /lit/, what is it that everyone has against this series?
I don't plan on reading them, but I'm just curious why everyone here seems to dislike them.

So even as a kid, I knew that these books...kinda sucked. I realized that I didn't give a fuck about the story or characters, but I was just in it for the dragons. Is there a series with cool, intelligent, good-guy dragons that's actually, well, good?

I never imagined people on 'this' board would end up liking Eragon. I personally think it's terrible.

>>3341773
/Thread

Did I only like Eragon because I had never seen Star Wars and never read Lord of the Rings?

Are the sequels better?

Leisurely reads for a high schooler?

Pic related, something in that genre, I loved it in high school.

inb4 you all suggest difficult novels so anons think you were intelligent in high school

Apparently there's a thorough review of Eragon that pulls it apart and explains exactly why it's bad

Does someone have a link to it?

I know Eragon is bad, but are there any reviews that show why it's bad? Like the Star Wars prequels have Plinkett, is there an equivalent version for Eragon which picks it apart?