/lit/ - Literature

>>21696859
Ted was too philosophically immature to understand that complete technological abandonment outside the complete death of our species is not only an impossibility but also the inferior way of dealing with things. He should rather have angled it differently. How can man control technics without being subsumed by it? There have been great figures in modern history that have proposed suggestions to deal with the rapid advancement of technology. Let me give you a hint: restorative myth + eugenics.

Myth will purpose man and enable a structure which can perform eugenics that continuously transform man's base into greater, more advanced heights. As forefathers, our transformed progeny will be the ones that will keep up with technological progress and repurpose it as a means of and end to human destiny.