/lit/ - Literature

WHAT DOES A JEWISH BRITON SAY WHEN HE IS DISMAYED?

IT DID NOT AT ALL.

WHY WOULD YOU ASSUME THAT?

YOU MUST BE IGNORANT RE HISTORY.

>>3397152

HE WAS NOT A "DICK".

http://thevagabondisland.tumblr.com/psy

>>2528253

NO.

ONE CAN LISTEN TO MUSIC IN "GREATER DETAIL" WITH HEADPHONES/EARPHONES WHETHER THERE IS "OUTSIDE NOISE" OR NOT.

SHE IS NOT ALICE LIDDELL.

MY EYES GOT "TEARY" WHEN I FINISHED READING "THE CATCHER IN THE RYE", AND WHEN I READ "FOR ESMÉ: WITH LOVE AND SQUALOR" I SHED TWO TEARS.

>>2469127

YOU MUST BE "STUPID".

THE FACT THAT WE BOTH TYPE IN CAPITAL LETTERS DOES NOT IMPLY THAT ONE IMITATES THE OTHER, AND OUR "STYLE" IS OVERLY DIFFERENT.

JUDGING BASED MERELY ON THE CAPITALIZATION IS SIGN OF YOUR POOR INTUITION, AND YOUR POOR PERCEPTION.

>PERSONS WHO USE "STICKY BOOKMARKS".
>PERSONS WHO BEND THE BOOK THAT THEY ARE READING.
>PERSONS WHO ASK "WHAT IS IT ABOUT?"
>PERSONS WHO LIKE "FANTASY".
>PERSONS WHO LIKE "SCIENCE FICTION".
>PERSONS WHO FLAMBOYANTLY ACT AS IF THEY "LIKED LITERATURE" BECAUSE THEY READ ALL THE "BEST SELLERS".
>PLEBEIANS WHO DISLIKE PLEBEIANS, WHILST UNAWARE OF THEY BEING PLEBEIANS.
>PERSONS WHO "CLASSIFY" A NOVEL INTO A "GENRE", OR A "SUBGENRE" BECAUSE OTHERWISE THEY FEEL "CONFUSED", AND IF THEY CANNOT "CLASSIFY" A NOVEL INTO A "GENRE" OR A "SUBGENRE", THEY FEEL "CONFUSED", AND DO NOT COMPREHEND THE NOVEL.

ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．  ＨＥＬＬＯ．

THE "ANOMALY" IS POSTING AS "Anonymous", NOT POSTING WITH A NAME/TRIPCODE.

POSTING AS "Anonymous" IS NOT "COMPULSORY", THERE IS EVEN A "NAME FIELD".

EVERYWHERE ELSE IN THE WORLD WIDE WEB ONE REGISTERS, POSTS, ETCETERA, WITH A NAME, OR A KIND OF "IDENTITY".

THE "SIDEOPTION" IS POSTING AS "Anonymous".

THE QUESTION IS: WHY DO YOU NOT POST WITH A NAME/TRIPCODE?

>Why do some persons take the political opinions of writers seriously?

BECAUSE THEY CANNOT THINK LOGICALLY AND LACK INTUITION, THUS ANY KIND OF CONCEPT EXPRESSED ELOQUENTLY WILL MAKE AN "INTENSE IMPRESSION" ON THEIR MINDS.

BOTH PERSONS ARE PARTIAL TO "EUROPEAN CULTURE" IN DIFFERENT MANNERS.

THE FIRST PERSON ACKNOWLEDGES THAT OTHER CULTURES HAVE "SIMILAR PRACTICES/RITES/ETCETERA" TO "WESTERN PHILOSOPHY" BUT "THEIRS" ARE "UNDERDEVELOPED & PRIMITIVE".

THE SECOND PERSON ACKNOWLEDGES OTHER CULTURE'S "PRACTICES/RITES/ETCETERA", AND THINKS THAT THEY ARE "PHILOSOPHIES" BUT OVERLY DIFFERENT IN NATURE TO "WESTERN PHILOSOPHY". THE SECOND PERSON HOLDS OTHER CULTURE'S "PHILOSOPHIES" FROM A "CONDESCENDING" AND/OR "PATRONIZING" STANCE.

THE FIRST PERSON COULD BE CLASSIFIED AS A "RIGHTIST".

THE SECOND PERSON COULD BE CLASSIFIED AS A "LEFTIST".

I WOULD CHOOSE OPTION "F"; HAVE TENDER SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH ONE FICTIONAL CHARACTER EVERY WEEK.

I WOULD SACRIFICE "Deist".

I DISLIKE HIM.