[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.20351525 [View]
File: 15 KB, 330x310, EC719924-2B7C-4267-A21C-685B08582D64.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20351525

>>20351410
>>20351418
>>20351428
>>20351436
>>20351462
The argument people make when they compare abortion to the handmaids tale isn’t about the morality of abortion. They’re more upset that men have a say on abortion because of muh body! They think that men having a say in the matter (in an open and democratic society no less) is an oppressive form of control.
They realised that they weren’t getting anywhere with the whole “abortion is ok because the fetus doesn’t count as a life” argument so they transitioned their talking points and strategy accordingly. Now morality is not even a part of the discussion. If you try to bring it up all they’ll say is “it’s a woman’s body so your opinion doesn’t matter anyway” and they never have to bother debating morality.
Now having the wrong opinion on abortion is equivalent to a form of oppression all on its own

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]