[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.14337623 [View]
File: 8 KB, 213x237, 1576078911536.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14337623

>>14337610
>all muslims are anti trans

>> No.14334855 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 8 KB, 213x237, 1576078911536.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14334855

>philosophy thread #29274
>poopskin religion thread #292728
>gweenon vs whitehead thread #9372
>tfw no gf thread #993628262836
>Christianity BAD vs Christianity GOOD thread #274847287

>> No.14334763 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 8 KB, 213x237, 1576078911536.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14334763

>basing your identity, existence, and lifestyle around the philosophy of not having children

>> No.14239095 [View]
File: 8 KB, 213x237, C43F43C1-5BCF-4CA0-AF65-ECFC60357A6A.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14239095

>>14239015
> copies my post
> still misses the point

>> No.13987312 [View]
File: 8 KB, 213x237, brainlet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13987312

Lit, what is your summary process. I am in a phil class where I have to summarize an article every week. My marks have been fine but I feel like my process sucks. I read the article 3 or 4 times with minor annotations and then I go through section by section and summarize in my own words. 10k word article took me about 4 hours going section by section after I had read it 3 times, so probably 5 hours in total is that slow or reasonable?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]