/lit/ - Literature

>Buddhism is life denying
You do understand that it was literally written as a critique to actual life denying movements of the time?
To deny life is to cling to the idea of some escape, instead he teaches not to cling to he idea of pleasure of pain as both are fleeting and static. You don’t deny life by admitting that one cannot and therefore shouldn’t hold onto a permenant reality.

Not even Buddhist desu, but you guys have such a poor understanding of it that it’s blows my mind. Seriously stop getting all your ideas of Buddhism from the atheist who meditates 10 minutes a day and considers him himself an enlightened being.

Will you join me in two years of deep meditation so I can prove it to you?
No?
Then you have absolutely no room to disregard it with.