/lit/ - Literature

>>21965239
>unlimited evidence to the contrary

>>20619233
>schizo
>phoneposter
>tourist
my mans a triple threat

Daily reminder that you haven't significantly altered your thought processes and mental patterns in almost a decade, only the external factors you apply them to

gotta say i don't really mind the christcucks or the fascists or the retarded frenfrogs etc, at least they have the ability to keep to themselves. it's the pompous faggots who spill their vaginas all over the place by typing out incoherent and hysterical effortposts about muh decline of western civ whenever they get the chance, in any thread, usually accompanied by photographs of hella f*ckin epic roman statues. i pity the people who have to endure these bores in real life

>not reading the individual poetry collections of the author where available (the true thematic experience)
collected poems are soulless

>>18553893
>a prolific writer and podcaster

>>18539723
you are posting your shit on a literature board and your writing is bad. fucking unreadable, blud. me finishing the first act is not going to change that. you flaunting this self-perceived secret schizo genius persona or whatever has zero to do with the quality of the sad document under review. sampling pages all over i can see that this unbearable style of yours – the airball cliches, the embarrassing onomatopoeia, the dogshit dialogue – persists. not even high school freshmen turn in slop like this

i suggest you get into some serious sentence-by-sentence analysis before going over this pile of trash again. rip it up and start over. and cut redditisms like "ginormous" if you want more than a cursory glance and a wee chuckle from anyone even remotely literary minded. at least pretend that you're standing on the shoulders of giants here

or turn it into a screenplay. because it clearly is one, screaming to burst free from this 'novel' it finds itself grafted onto. penned by a sorry cunt who just had his first bong rip during a boondock saints showing

(watch this fag taking everything i just wrote as a compliment because he's an epic bacon outsider artiste)

>nameless narrator/main character
why do authors do this? it feels like they're merely putting up cheap and unnecessary obstacles for themselves, like why make a point of something you have to skirt around all the time? character interaction becomes clumsy and unnatural as well