/lit/ - Literature

Shieeeet negro.

>mfw studying Phenomenology of Spirit

Assumptions on top of assumptions. Shieeet, the least he could have done was not start dividing shit up and offering contradictions in his work by saying the parts are the whole but they are parts which can recognize the whole. That's not even applicable to reason but fundamentally unreasonable. Then you got the Hegelian dialectic, which thoroughly misuses Heraclitus by offering it's own inherent contradictions, fucking tearing through the work as some divine shit passed own through the ages. Let's ignore causality, being, time and try to jam the metaphysics Kant sought to let go of back into the work through another angle. All his notions of consciousnesses and it's stages are something he derives from cognitive experience and something i think Kant would be against seeing as how Hegel is trying to bring the "thing in itself" stuff to the pragmatism but then wanting to divide what can be really real from the real? There is virtually nothing to bring in since a "thing in itself" is also a notion derived from cognition. He divides the subject and the object again by implying that they ever regurgitated or have anti thesis in the first place. My jimmies are beyond themselves from the rustling at this point.

Now i can see why Schopenhauer was so buttmad at this guy. Were we talking about Nietzsche? Whatever.