/lit/ - Literature

>>17708543
>This is why everyone is accusing them
They get accused because there's historical precedent for such operations. They get accused because there's ample evidence that israel & cia directly arm them, give them intel or medical treatment while ISIS seemingly does their dirty work on one level. Pragmatically they function to sow discord in the middle east and topple regimes unfavorable to the West's economic and geo-political interests. Their operation is short-sighted because they release propaganda videos and claim responsibility of senseless terrorist acts that simply make them appear evil, acting out unjustifiable revenge fantasies by targeting innocent civilians, they don't even claim it as collateral damage or militarily necessary. No one would need to false-flag ISIS because they do such a good job incriminating themselves lol.

There definitely are true believers among them but it's another case of the West using simple-minded folk until they no longer serve a useful function. basically even if they secured a country for hardline muslims they'd be unable to deal economically or politically with any other country on earth and would be easy targets for future "regime changes" themselves, any country would have instant justification for going against ISIS because they do such a horrible PR job representing themselves and their interests and don't even try to mask or justify their terrorism. It's at such a comical level that the most reasonable assumptions is to believe they've been subverted and are short-term tools with no real long-term future stability possible.