/lit/ - Literature

>>18425230

Are you able to make the difference between these 2 words: INCARNATION / REINCARNATION ?

>There is no realm of forms separated from phenomena and no phenomena separated from the world of forms, thus it is obvious how forms and soul are not in different places because they are in no place at all. Ontological distinction is not spatial one.
Induction is present in Plato as potency for actualization of the forms. The actualization of forms in the soul is the actualization of it in phenomena.

Again, Plato's forms are transcendental. Defintion below:

Adjective. transcendent, surpassing, or superior. being beyond ordinary or common experience, thought, or belief; supernatural. abstract or metaphysical. idealistic, lofty, or extravagant.

Plato's forms are not in the phenomenal world. That would destroy the most fundamental dinstinction of Plato's theory. If you say Plato's forms are not separate from the phenomenal world, then you're saying that they're immanent.

Languages forces me to refer to forms as existing somewhere spacially different. Of course it doesn't have a special "space", but they don't exist in the sensible world.

You didn't didn't answer me how Plato proves any of the assumptions I specified (4 of them) in the other post. You're still talking with these assumptions.

>This is in the anamnesis allegory, peanbrain.

Then why are you denying that the soul fuses with the body ?

>Lmao

You clearly got no clue, check pic related. I could have showed you from wikipedia or any of the other sources you find on a simple search on google (written by academics).