/lit/ - Literature

>>18177925
The way Nietzsche uses it - certainly could be. One simply does not have share Nietzsche's humanitarian goals of overcoming the flaws of humanity. Aren't "flaws" just as spooky as "sins"? Stirner's rapprochement to the Last Man is indirect - he doesn't say it, but he speaks of it. A lot of things that Stirner says are implicit, and it goes over the head of a lot of people.

>>18071434
>You don't have any other options
But I do - I don't have worship a god who created evil in the first fucking place. I don't have to care about the concept of god in the first place.
>See In the end it all boils down to the same childish whining
You think freedom can not exist without evil? Also, this WEIRD argument too - because there's reason for you complain about nihilism, atheism, or any other religion if god created "FREEDOM." I guess he gave us the FREEDOM to do whatever we please then, fucking retard. God gave me the ability freedom to not believe in objective morality, so, thanks for completely wasting everyone's time with your self refuting argument. Thank GOD for creating the tools I need to NULLIFY his existence, retard.