[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.18798556 [View]
File: 7 KB, 201x251, proxy-image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>18798474

>> No.17640826 [View]
File: 7 KB, 201x251, boppyhauer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17640826

>For example, should he defend suicide, you may at once exclaim, "Why don't you hang yourself?" Should he maintain that Berlin is an unpleasant place to live in, you may say, "Why don't you leave by the first train?" Some such claptrap is always possible

Schopenhauer on "The Art of Being Right"

>> No.17362599 [View]
File: 7 KB, 201x251, images.jpeg-7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17362599

Refute him

When we read, another person thinks for us: we merely repeat his mental process. In learning to write, the pupil goes over with his pen what the teacher has outlined in pencil: so in reading; the greater part of the work of thought is already done for us. This is why it relieves us to take up a book after being occupied with our own thoughts. And in reading, the mind is, in fact, only the playground of another’s thoughts. So it comes about that if anyone spends almost the whole day in reading, and by way of relaxation devotes the intervals to some thoughtless pastime, he gradually loses the capacity for thinking; just as the man who always rides, at last forgets how to walk. This is the case with many learned persons: they have read themselves stupid.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]