/lit/ - Literature

>>11461065

>Tells me all I need to know, without reference point to any social background or anything really would mean your artistic endeavor is pointless and without meaning. Which is actually contrary to any desire to be "worldly" as that would actually imply a reference point within the world.

You realize your own principle here can be used to argue Gass is good because he represents a specific social setting, the university, right?


But you're probably going to reply that certain social settings are (((decadent))) rather than sticking by an actual artistic generative principle.

Btw I would actually like to read your novel about modern sterility if it was well read.

I'm done engaging with you though because it's clear you're unable to read Gass and understand what I'm talking about isn't simple trangressive literature like Henry Miller or some shit.