/lit/ - Literature

>Who might've been

>>19064836
>mfw she didn't know about Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas until recently
You have to wonder how these people who are supposed to be be all about books apparently just read modern trash purely because it's modern and can't stand the classics.

>>18999423
>harassment
if you can't stand the heat, get the fuck out of the kitchen. why do some people think their shitty opinions are immune to responses?

>>18973772
>mfw good reads redesign

>>17246162
fucking insufferable with all the jump cuts and attempts at juvenile humor.

>mfw his "canceling authors" video
good to know he's a coward as well

>>13251079
>using "hamster" unironically
>projecting your cumbrain worldview onto everyone else

>>11061809
What in the world are you talking about, you incorrigible neophyte? Don't bring the word "unlikable" into such absolutist nonsense. Are you such a pedant you'd require someone to specifically describe what reference point they were using when they accredited something as being "tall"? You may be shocked to find that "unlikable" does not mean "literally impossible to be liked."

But now that we're past that, I might need to accuse you of either not actually reading books or that you are unfortunately retarded. To put it simply, unlikable characters are ones who are disliked because of their actions, and the absence of anything to justify them. Recent memory calls to the titular Monk from The Monk, who fell from grace through a spiral of irredeemable debauchery so foul you could only feel satisfaction when he met his demise.

I'm truly having difficulty understanding what you're getting at with all that textual diarrhea -- what the fuck does Trump have to do with any of this? The concept of a character that is generally disliked should not be difficult to understand, and your continued failure to grasp such a simple concept worries me.