/lit/ - Literature

>>18351154
either bait or you have such a profounded smooth brain conception of buddhism
either way you seem to be seething that buddhism actually exists, quite funny

>>16396465
>How so? You will cease to exist, cease to have experience of anything, cease to have a self ; what distinguishes it from atheist death?
Atheists have no concept of nirvana

>I literally wrote in the very sentence you're quoting : "I'm not arguing retard, I'm asking you why you want to die, stop existing, be nada. Certainly insofar as you're not answering, I'm working off the assumption you have a regular psyche." (hence the reference to normal thought, normal preferences, etc.)
already answered that

>And I'm insulting you because you're arguing in a smug and unproductive manner, you honestly deserve it.
lol mad

>Where do you live where people die hating their life, concluding they didn't take pleasure from food (or friends, family, etc.)? This is honestly baffling.
when did i say this?

>Meditation provides you a direct experience of what you advance (reincarnation existing and working as you say, for exemple)? How do you know you're not mistaken?
I don't and never claimed to

>Isn't the point of reading teachings to gather arguments from them?
the point is to attain nirvana

>Hyperbolic means it's an exageration
"I wasn't incorrect I was Hyperbolic"
ok

>But assuming you mean by that that I need to prove to you most people have meditated
I mean you did try to use "most people meditated" as some sort of argument or something when you clearly made that up.

>It shows that it's not obvious meditating will lead you to the conclusions it has led you
I didn't say meditation will always lead to enllightenment but meditation is vital to enlightenment.