/lit/ - Literature

Are jews the ubermensch as described by Nietzsche?
>possess the will to power
>impose their will on all of society
>embody aristocratic values
>live and succeed in the actual world instead of dreaming of a world to come
>rich
>successful
>control all aspects of society
>determine their own moral code
And is the average 4chan poster what Nietzche would describe as the last man?
>weak
>pathetic
>does not get women
>unsuccessful in life
>seeks comfort and security
>follows outdated religious morality in a futile reaction to his own nihilism
>faps
>believes that he will get what he deserves in a made up world to come while he lives and dies in the real world as a loser?

>Oh, what are you anyway, my written and painted thoughts! It was not
long ago that you were still so colorful, young and malicious, so full of
thorns and secret spices that you made me sneeze and laugh – and now?
You have already lost your novelty, and I am afraid that some of you are
ready to turn into truths: they already look so immortal, so pathetically
decent and upright, so boring! And was it ever any different? So, what
subjects do we copy out and paint, we mandarins with Chinese brushes,
we immortalizers of things that let themselves be written – what are the
only things we can paint? Oh, only ever things that are about to wilt
and lose their smell! Only ever storms that have exhausted themselves
and are moving off, and feelings that are yellowed and late! Only ever
birds that have flown and flown astray until they are tired and can be
caught by hand, – by our hand! We only immortalize things that cannot
live and fly for much longer, only tired and worn-out things! And I only
have colors for your afternoon, my written and painted thoughts, perhaps
many colors, many colorful affections and fifty yellows and browns and
greens and reds: – but nobody will guess from this how you looked in
your morning, you sudden sparks and wonders of my solitude, you, my
old, beloved – – wicked thoughts!

>Be Neetche
>BTFO the entire Abrahamic religion in a single aphorism
>If God had wanted to become an object of love, he would first of all have had to to forgo judging and justice:—a judge, and even a gracious judge, is no object of love.

What is truth? A mobile army of metaphors, metonyms, and anthropomorphisms—in short, a sum of human relations which have been enhanced, transposed, and embellished poetically and rhetorically, and which after long use seem firm, canonical, and obligatory to a people: truths are illusions about which one has forgotten that this is what they are; metaphors which are worn out and without sensuous power; coins which have lost their pictures and now matter only as metal, no longer as coins.

>>20656433
>We have seen how it is originally language which works on the construction of concepts, a labor taken over in later ages by science. Just as the bee simultaneously constructs cells and fills them with honey, so science works unceasingly on this great columbarium of concepts, the graveyard of perceptions. It is always building new, higher stories and shoring up, cleaning, and renovating the old cells; above all, it takes pains to fill up this monstrously towering framework and to arrange therein the entire empirical world, which is to say, the anthropomorphic world. Whereas the man of action binds his life to reason and its concepts so that he will not be swept away and lost, the scientific investigator builds his hut right next to the tower of science so that he will be able to work on it and to find shelter for himself beneath those bulwarks which presently exist. And he requires shelter, for there are frightful powers which continuously break in upon him, powers which oppose scientific truth with completely different kinds of "truths" which bear on their shields the most varied sorts of emblems

Moral realism and just world hypothesis is the most unintelligible bullshit ever. If there was an inherently "just world" in the sense of oppressed and victim beating oppressor and victor, war and conquest would not be possible. The moments wars were initiated, the initiating side would cease to exist as an immediate punishment. Yet this is not the case, so there is no "just world" of karma or sin.

>>19885725
>you will feel guilty and disgusted
because you are an untermenschen

>power is all that matters
>dies as a lonely shut in incel in a mad house after spending his life shitposting in his diary in the basement
Am i getting filtered or what?

>a german neet incel shitposter is one of the greatest philosophers of all time
lmao

>>19473639
>Has a simple and comprehensive system that filters anybody with an iq below 90
>Destroys Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and all of their pseud followers with one aphorism
>still unmogged by any past or present philosopher
>btfos christcucks which keep eternally seething
>rarely ever even mentions women, which is why they and their simps keep seething
>fucks around non stop to the point of getting stds
>has more compassion towards animals than subhumans
>dies and reaches the goal of his life which was to change the entire history of philophical thought in the world
only christcucks and trannies hate him
which one are you?

The word "chandala" pronounced in English has a bizarre euphony to it. It sounds absolute funny regardless of its original denotation of a corpsebearer.

It evokes a dangling micropenis, flipping back and forth. It also evokes a chime, a "chingling". It just sounds fucking ridiculous. Other things it evokes - a rhyme for mandala, resulting in such silly wordplay as "chandala mandala", a circle of corpsebearers. "Chistian chandala", a seeming non-sense phrase that nonetheless evokes the mad American Christian Christian mob. Chandal, an invective to spit at someone. Chandala, chandala, chandala.

what did he mean by dionysian?
can you describe to me a dionysian experience/existance?

>Ascetic ideals indicate so many bridges to independence that a philosopher cannot, without an inner rejoicing and applause, listen to the history of all those decisive people who one day said no to all lack of freedom and went off to some desert or other, even given the fact that such people were strong donkeys and entirely different from a powerful spirit.
>So what, then, does the ascetic ideal mean as far as a philosopher is concerned? My answer is—you will have guessed it long ago—the philosopher smiles when he sees an optimal set of conditions for the loftiest and boldest spirituality. In so doing, he does not deny "existence"; rather that's how he affirms his existence and only his existence, and does this perhaps to such a degree that he stays close to the wicked desire perat mundus, fiat philosphia, fiat phiosophus, fiam! ... ["Let the world perish, but let philosophy exist, let the philosopher exist, let me exist!"]

>All honor to the ascetic ideal insofar as it is honest! so long as it believes in itself and does not play tricks on us!

nietzsche wasn't nietzschian enough

>we still haven't made new gods in two centuries
our society is dying at an alarming pace
the best we can create are small scale cutls

seriously what did he mean by
>gay science
>ecce homo

If he was born in this age he would be a neet shit posting on 4chin/twatter/youtube

N

Is Nietzsche absolutely correct about Christianity? All I keep hearing is cope from Christians, because he pinpoints exactly how harmful Christianity. Has anyone written successfully against him?

*pleb filtered*

read schopy

>>17812915
Based

>>17812375
the anglo isn't a philosophical race

>>17583885
>Now we have the general idea to which are to be subordinated the feelings which the Greek had with regard to labour and slavery. Both were considered by them as a necessary disgrace, of which one feels ashamed, as a disgrace and as a necessity at the same time. In this feeling of shame is hidden the unconscious discernment that the real aim needs those conditional factors, but that in that need lies the fearful and beast-of-prey-like quality of the Sphinx Nature, who in the glorification of the artistically free culture-life so beautifully stretches forth her virgin-body, Culture, which is chiefly a real need for art, rests upon a terrible basis: the latter however makes itself known in the twilight sensation of shame. In order that there may be a broad, deep, and fruitful soil for the development of art, the enormous majority must, in the service of a minority be slavishly subjected to life's struggle, to a greater degree than their own wants necessitate. At their cost, through the surplus of their labour, that privileged class is to be relieved from the struggle for existence, in order to create and to satisfy a new world of want. Accordingly we must accept this cruel sounding truth, that slavery is of the essence of Culture; a truth of course, which leaves no doubt as to the absolute value of Existence. This truth is the vulture, that gnaws at the liver of the Promethean promoter of Culture. The misery of toiling men must still increase in order to make the production of the world of art possible to a small number of Olympian men.

>Out of the emasculation of modern man has been born the enormous social distress of the present time, not out of the true and deep commiseration for that misery; and if it should be true that the Greeks perished through their slavedom then another fact is much more certain, that we shall perish through the lack of slavery. Slavedom did not appear in any way objectionable, much less abominable, either to early Christianity or to the Germanic race. What an uplifting effect on us has the contemplation of the medieval bondman, with his legal and moral relations,-relations that were inwardly strong and tender,-towards the man of higher rank, with the profound fencing-in of his narrow existence-how uplifting!-and how reproachful!